Clarifying user request
The user shared a Chinese headline about Liverpool possibly punishing Salah, and I need to respond appropriately. They didn't explicitly ask a question, so they might want a summary or confirmation. I should ask if they want verification, more context, or the source of the rumor. Since I'm working with a network sandbox, I can't obtain real-time information after my last cutoff in October 2024. So, it would be good to confirm with the user what they need.Framing user response
I need to handle a user inquiry that doesn't fit a simple command. I should ask if they want verification of the rumor about Liverpool and Salah. It would be wise to suggest checking credible sources or official club statements and to ask for a link to the original post. I can provide a general framework on how to evaluate rumors and typical disciplinary actions from clubs. Since I might not be able to search the web, it’s best to confirm what the user wants first.
这更像标题党/未经证实的传闻。几个快速判断点：
- “欧冠内部禁赛”不是欧足联的正式概念；俱乐部可以队规处罚、不报名或不选入大名单，但不能颁布所谓“内部欧冠禁赛”的官方禁赛令。
- 若真要冬窗出售萨拉赫，通常会有权威信号：俱乐部/主帅公开表态、可靠记者（Paul Joyce、James Pearce、David Ornstein、BBC/Sky、The Athletic）多方独立跟进、潜在买家报价细节等。
- 没有这些链路、只有“名记曝”的话，可信度存疑。
需要我帮你核查真伪并给出来源汇总吗？发下原始链接或出处，我也可以帮你查权威报道并做结论。